Second Dutch political party asks questions about discriminatory laws against whites by South Africa

After Dutch MP Martin Bosma asked many questions in the Lower House of parliament this past year - (he is even writing a book about the growing discrimination against whites in South Africa and summarised that at least 110 laws were drawn up to ban white South Africans from all means of making a living for themselves and plunging them into dire poverty and homelessness) - a second political party MP now has also started asking similar questions, in the run-up to the Dutch Provincial State elections in March. Following are the written questions submitted to the Foreign Affairs Minister of The Netherlands by Han Van Broeke, a leading MP of the liberal VVD, (23 February 2015) ENGLISH TRANSLATION ATTACHED ON PAGE GRAB http://hantenbroeke.nl/index.php/tweede-kamerr/schriftelijke-vragen/2752-vragen-over-over-politieke-ontwikkelingen-in-zuid-afrika ===================== Questions in Dutch (See English translations attached with our pagegrab translation) Han ten Broeke: " Vragen over over politieke ontwikkelingen in Zuid-Afrika 23 februari 2015 Schriftelijke vragen van het lid Ten Broeke (VVD) aan de minister van Buitenlandse Zaken over politieke ontwikkelingen in Zuid-Afrika (ingediend 23 februari 2015). Vraag 1 Zuid-Afrika is inmiddels meer dan 20 jaar een democratie. Hoe beoordeelt u de staat van de democratie en rechtsstaat in Zuid-Afrika? En hoe beoordeelt u in het bijzonder het leiderschap van de Zuid-Afrikaanse president Zuma? Vraag 2 Ondanks de afschaffing van het Apartheidssysteem, lijkt racisme geenszins verdwenen uit de Zuid-Afrikaanse samenleving. Kunt u een appreciatie geven van de inspanningen van de Zuid-Afrikaanse regering in de strijd tegen discriminatie? En is er in Zuid-Afrika sprake van discriminerende wetgeving? Vraag 3 Bent u bekend met berichten dat positieve discriminatie in Zuid-Afrika op zo'n manier wordt toegepast dat veel jonge blanken geen toekomst meer zien in hun land en massaal emigreren? Kunt u deze bevestigen, en zo ja, hoe beoordeelt u deze? Vraag 4 Wat is de stand van zaken rondom de door de Europese Raad geïnitieerde mensenrechtendialoog met Zuid-Afrika? Vraag 5 Hoe beoordeelt u de rol die Zuid-Afrika in de regio speelt, bijvoorbeeld in de Afrikaanse Unie en de mate waarin Zuid-Afrika deelneemt aan vredesmissies? Is deze volgens u in de afgelopen jaren veranderd? http://hantenbroeke.nl/index.php/tweede-kamerr/schriftelijke-vragen/2752-vragen-over-over-politieke-ontwikkelingen-in-zuid-afrika ============== Dutch author Eric de Witte's eloquent plea for Afrikaners to create their own autonomous Free State inside present-day South africa: The Dutch-language daily Dagelijkse Standaard also writes that 'economic discrimination strikes mainly at Afrikaners: through laws drawn up by the ANC the party tries to strike at the ability of AFrikaners to earn a living (hitting them economically) with positive economic discrimination. These are draconian measures which act against minorities. For instance the law named Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, passed in 2003, allows the government to punish Afrikaner-owned companies by its rule that they promote the ultimate 100% black ownership of company and install 'quotas for the number of blacks' on the shop floors of Afrikaner owned companies. This racist quota is only one of the many measures which the regime has launched against Afrikaners. Another law allows the government to intervene against job-provider companies ('arbeidsburos') which put Afrikaners to work. The corruption by the ANC regime strikes many people economically in the rainbow state. During apartheid, the life expectancy of all ethnic groups averaged 62 years in 1990 - now this has dropped to 56. These statistics aren't thumb-sucks: they were drawn up by state-statistics and cannot be seen in a seperate light from the enormous increase of violent criminality since the ANC took over hegemony of South Africa. Many of the ethnic groups in South Africa are forced to discard their own ethnic-identities and forced into a black-ruled regimen prescribed by the black ruling majority party, the ANC. This deliberately suppression of the great many South African ethnic languages to forge a fake single 'South African identity dominated by the ruling black majority is an example of this.' Despite the Freedom Charter on which South African hegemony is now based, the government claims that it does not have the right to excert authority over every group without their own permission and that these groups must all enjoy ' equal status'. The Freedom Charter refers to 'all South African ethnic groups' without making any difference between 'white' or 'black'. It's interesting to know that the Freedom Charter is a statement which the ANC is proud of and uses frequently in its claims that this is one of the basic core-principles which has formed their ruling party. However it appears from the current developments that the ANC is 'selective' about interpretation of the Freedom Charter and does NOT apply it to Afrikaners. The ruling party also pulls its ancient discussion from the closet where even the right to exist in South Africa is being denied to the Afrikaners - even though the previous president stated that 'South Africans are truly South African when they have no second home'. According to these words the founder of the South African 'colony' would not be a South African 'because Jan van Riebeeck used the cape of good-hope as a provisioning post for passing VOC ships. However the current-day Afrikaner descendants of that VOC post are truly South Africans who have no ties at all with their original countries of origin. The passage from the Freedom Charter 'South Africa belongs to ALL who live in it, black and white' appears to end this discussion. The great fear (of annihilation) amongst the Afrikaner population can explain the growing popularity of the only 'pro-Afrikaner' party in parliament, namely the Freedom Front Plus head by Dr. Pieter Mulder. During its negotiations with the black majority this party managed in 1994 to have a provision added to the constitution of article 235 - self-autonomy - which would allow the Afrikaners to create an autonomous province inside the greater South African Republic. The other Afrikaner party which was recently founded, the Front Nasionaal, as well as the FFplus, are increasingly raising the issue of creating the Afrikaners' own Freestate inside present-day South Africa. Partyleader Mulder writes that his party is actively lobbying at the Forum on Minority Issues at the United Nations drawing attention to the plight of the Afrikaners and the failure of the African National Congress to treat them with equal rights. He also wrote that wanting their own autonomous FreeState inside South Africa has nothing to do with racism or apartheid, but is simply the result of the 'hard reality which the current multi-ethnic society of South Africa presents to Afrikaners. He maintains that their right to autonomy is the only certainty the Afrikaner nation has to assure their rights to their own language, justice system, culture and education is protected inside their own Free State. -- The VVD party in the Netherlands has lodged written questions about the recent political developments in South Africa http://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/2015/02/die-afrikaner-vryheid/ ---------------------------- TWEET:#SouthAfrica Questions in #Dutch parliament by #liberal #VVD party MP about anti-white #discrimination laws pic.twitter.com/RYl2r7q9rW =======================